My Great Journey Part 8D
In the previous sections, we explored
the story of Creation, the notion of spectrum of identity, the obligation to
save lives, and the obligation not to harm people’s chances of living. In this section, we will explore the specific
commandments that seem to prohibit transitioning, and by seeing their true
meanings, understand that there IS room in Biblical tradition, for
transitioning to our true genders, above and beyond the overriding requirement
of living, and not dying by them.
The Biblical (Tanakh) commandments in
question are:
ה
לֹא-יִהְיֶה כְלִי-גֶבֶר עַל-אִשָּׁה וְלֹא-יִלְבַּשׁ גֶּבֶר שִֹמְלַת
אִשָּׁה
כִּי תוֹעֲבַת ה' אֱלקיךָ כָּל-עֹשֵֹה אֵלֶּה:
Lo yih’yeh khli
gever al isha, v’lo yilbash gever simlat isha;
Ki to’avat H
Elokekha kol oseih eileh.
Deut 22:5: Women
shall not wear men’s clothing (lit. men’s instruments – i.e. weapons) and men
shall not wear women’s clothing – because all who do this are (carrying out) an
abomination to H’ Your God.
וְלֹא תַשְׁחִית אֵת פְּאַת זְקָנֶךָ:
V’lo tashhit
eit p’at z’kanekha.
Lev. 19:27b: Do not destroy the corners of your beard.
לֹא-יָבֹא פְצוּעַ-דַּכָּה וּכְרוּת שָׁפְכָה
בִּקְהַל ה'
Lo yavo f’tzu’a dakah u’khrut shofkhah bik’hal H’.
Deut. 23:2: There
shall not be (lit. he shall not go) wounding by crushing (testicles) and cut
off male organs in H’s congregation.
Simply
put, destroying male genitals is prohibited.
Lastly there is a rabbinic edict on
Holiness:
מעלין בקודש ואין מורידין.
Ma’alin
b’kodesh v’ein moridin.
We raise
our Holiness, and do not lower it.
This is found in the Babylonian Talmud
in three tractates: Yoma 12B, Megillah 9B and Menahot 39A.
Now, how do we make sense of these,
aside from the teaching that saving lives overrides all other concerns?
First, we’ll examine Deut. 22:5
Women shall not wear men’s clothing
(lit. men’s instruments – i.e. weapons) and men shall not wear women’s clothing
– because all who do this are (carrying out) an abomination to H’ Your God.
First off Rashi[1]:
לא יהיה כלי גבר על אשה - שתהא דומה לאיש
כדי שתלך בין האנשים, שאין זו אלא לשם ניאוף:
Lo yih’yeh kli gever al isha: she’t’hei domeh l’ish k’dai
sh’teiliek bein ha’anashim, she’ein zo ela l’sheim n’iuf.
Women shall not wear men’s clothing: so they would be like
men, and go among the men; the only purpose for this is (to commit) adultery.
So, Rashi has no trust of women and thinks they will go to
sexual immorality.
Ib’n Ezra[2] states:
נסמכה
בעבור צאת למלחמה, כי האשה לא נבראת כי אם להקים הזרע
Nis’m’kha
b’avur tzeit l’milhama; ki ha’isha lo nivreit ki im l’hakim hzara.
An
insistence on going to war; (this is forbidden) since woman was created only to
raise children.
The commentators
say far less about men wearing women’s clothing, but ultimately come to the
same conclusion; that the only purpose for this is sexual immorality.
It is important
to remember that roles of men and women were different in Biblical and Rabbinic
times than in modern times, so judgement needs to be suspended. Ibn Ezra’s comment is based on the literal
translation of Kli Gever; which is instruments of might, i.e.
weapons. This understanding ultimately
comes from the Midrash, Sifri[3],
which states:
. ר׳
אליעזר בן יעקב אומר שלא תלבש אשה כלי זיין ותצא למלחמה
Rabbi Eliezer ben Ya’akov omer she’lo tilbash isha kli
zayyin v’teitzei l’milhama.
R’ Eliezer son of Jacob says that a woman should not wear
weapons and go to war.
Thus, whether you take Rashi’s view or that of the
Midrash (and the Targum, a very early Aramaic commentary on Bible), the bottom
line is that this is meant to ensure people live a proper life and fulfill the
roles they were created for. As we have
already established, transgender people were created with souls that do not
match their bodies, so we transition, in order to fulfill our proper roles in
life. Further, transgender people don’t wear cross gender clothing for sexual
purposes, we wear them to fulfill our lives as who we really are.
Next is Lev. 19:27b. “Do not destroy the corners of your beard.”
The verse that follows states “and
do not cut your skin (in grief over death of) a soul.”
There is a principle of exegesis we will explore in more
detail in a future section, which states that adjacent verses are related in
topic. Thus by this understanding, the
command to refrain from destroying the beard must be over an expression of
grief, and NOT over removing it for other reasons.
In fact, there are many Orthodox Jewish men who are clean
shaven, so clearly removing the beard under ordinary circumstances is not
prohibited.
Due to brevity constraints, this discussion will be
continued in the next section, where we will explore the commandment regarding
removing male genitals, and the principle of not reducing holiness.
No comments:
Post a Comment